Startup funds face marathon, not sprint, in Poland’s venture ecosystem
Why launching a VC fund in Poland still takes up to a year—even with institutional support
Behind every “first investment” headline in the Polish venture capital space lies a marathon of administrative hurdles, not a sprint to market. In September 2024, Poland’s PFR Ventures announced agreements with four new fund management teams, backed by EU money under FENG. By May 2025, only one had reached the investment stage. The nearly year-long gap is no anomaly—it reflects a systemic bottleneck in how venture capital operates in Poland.
The startup journey here doesn’t begin with a pitch deck or term sheet, but with a stack of paperwork for UOKiK, KNF, and the National Court Register (KRS). These institutions—necessary to ensure oversight—often become the invisible gatekeepers slowing down capital deployment.
Subscribe to Startup Digest to stay ahead with the latest news, investments, and must-attend events.
Two challenges stand out in particular:
Fundraising formalities – Raising capital from private LPs, especially family foundations or corporates, can be delayed by UBO verification (Ultimate Beneficial Owner) and physical documentation requirements.
Regulatory procedures – Even when funds secure backing from PFR Ventures, they must still navigate regulatory approvals that cannot proceed in parallel. KNF registration, ASI formation, and court registration each require separate steps, often weeks apart.
According to those involved, a key time-saving tactic is to collect broad powers of attorney from LPs early on—allowing a neutral legal representative to act on their behalf across all legal fronts. This single step can cut weeks off the timeline.
Still, delays persist. For example, the KNF application process, while standardized, can stretch beyond the stated two-month minimum if the fund’s documentation diverges from the regulator’s templates. Even minor deviations can lead to prolonged correspondence and revision cycles.
The UOKiK antitrust filing, while generally fast and predictable, is still mandatory—even for minority stakes—due to the scale of state co-investment via PFR. Most teams suggest submitting the merger filing during negotiations to save time.
The final hurdle is the dematerialization of fund shares through a brokerage firm—now a legal requirement post-reform. This process often surprises new managers due to its logistical complexity and timing sensitivity, especially when share registration becomes a gating factor for capital drawdowns.
In contrast, jurisdictions like Luxembourg offer startup fund managers a smoother path. There, registration of both the manager and the fund can take just six weeks, compared to Poland’s typical 4–8 months.
The takeaway: Starting a VC fund in Poland is more a test of administrative stamina than a lack of capital or ambition. The Polish ecosystem boasts experienced investors and rising LP interest, but it’s often bogged down by sequential compliance layers that stall fund deployment. Calls are growing for clearer legislative paths and standardized regulatory treatment to help founders—and their backers—move faster in a time-sensitive market.
